![]() The Iskander can reach targets deep inside Europe. Translation: an ultimate lethal weapon against airfields or logistic infrastructure. The Russian Iskander missile travels at Mach 7 - with a range of 400 kilometers, carrying a 700 kilogram warhead of several varieties, and with a circular error probability of around five meters. Russia, for its part, is already focusing on the state-of-the-art S-500 - which essentially makes the Patriot anti-missile system look like a V-2 from World War II. The bottom line is this will make Beijing impermeable to US air power, ICBMs and cruise missiles. ![]() Moscow has agreed to sell the S-400 surface-to-air missile system to China. Russian ICBMs armed with MIRVs travel at about 18 Mach that is way faster than anything in the US arsenal. ![]() Other pieces such as this at least hint at the obvious - glaring US strategic shortcomings. A Council on Foreign Relations study basically “found out” what Pravda had already reported. Washington/Wall Street elites are now deep into nuclear war paranoia. Then examine the strategic nuclear scenario, and it’s a totally different story. Take the compounded GDP of US, Germany, France and the UK and compare it to Russia it’s a victory by landslide. It’s pointless to compare the strategic nuclear capabilities of the US and Russia based on numbers, but not on quality. Now for the “threat” of nuclear war in Europe - bogus or otherwise. At least there’s a countercurrent: strands of informed Americans are wondering why the US should be paying for Europe’s defense when European GDP is larger than that of the US. This is perfectly in tune with the relentless US Think Tankland spin that NATO and the US will be “forced” to balance their commitment to security in Eastern Europe against potential Russian “aggression”.Īs Ukraine, the Baltic states and Poland persist in compounded hysteria about such “aggression”, the option of a post-MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) US-Russia nuclear war, terrifying as it must be, is now - casually - back on the discussion table. Washington has just announced that it will be pre-positioning more military vehicles in Europe to be used in exercises or “potential military operations”. This means NATO - essentially the US - planted right on Russia’s western border. Were Ukraine to become a NATO member in an albeit remote future, the shatter belt buffer zone would disappear. A new Berlin wall, this time US-built - from the Baltics to the Black Sea now runs through Kiev. Many of you will be familiar with the concept of “shatter belt” - territories and peoples that historically have been squeezed between the Germanic Eagle and the Russian Bear. As we stand, the whole shatter belt - apart from Ukraine and Belarus - has signed up to NATO. The US-propelled vassal currently starring in the oligarch dance in Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, last week advanced the proposition that Ukrainians in the near future, after his “reforms”, will be asked to vote on whether to join NATO. Are the United States, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and Russia on a mad spiral leading to yet another war in Europe? Is it inevitable? Far from it, wrote Pepe Escobar for Asia Times Online.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |